The reasons that you should choose JD to be your patent lawyer are briefly summarized as follows:
- JD's Focus and Expertise in Patent Law
- JD's Expertise in Technical Analysis and Patent Search
- JD's Emphasis on Covering-all-the-Bases-for-Clients
- JD's Independence in Terms of Making Decisions in Client's Interest
- JD's Success Stories
JD's Focus and Expertise in Patent Law
Since 2006, JD's practice focus has been on patent law only and nothing else. This laser sharp focus allows JD to keep up with, and develop expertise with regard to, up-to-date important caselaw in patent law, especially in important issues which have been constantly evolving, issues such as patent eligibility and non-obviousness. JD's up-to-date knowledge and expertise on those ever-evolving issues allows JD to provide patenting service with an up-to-date forward vision towards not only persuading an Examiner of the USPTO to issue patent during patent prosecution, but also establishing narratives (favorable to a client) for the purpose of discussing and addressing potential contentious issues as early as when a patent application is being drafted. It is well-known that an issued patent is often challenged for validity after the patent is later asserted against an infringer. Such a forward-looking approach tends to make an issued patent not just any patent, but a much more valuable patent when the time has finally arrived for enforcing the patent against an infringer and/or the patent being potentially acquired by a major company.
Why JPL (In Construction)
JD's Emphasis on Covering-all-the-Bases-for-Clients (In Construction)
JD's Independence in Terms of Making Decisions in Client's Interest (In Construction)
JD's Success Stories (In Construction)
JD's Expertise in Technical Analysis and Patent Search
JD had been working in the technology industries for 12 years. JD is also knowledgeable and savvy in general physics and electronics. So JD is technical when it comes to element-by-element technical analysis for patent claims, which is essential and critical for coming up with strong and persuasive legal argument in a patent case.
Besides, JD has developed to become an expert patent searcher, with his own approach tailored to generating superior search results of relevant prior art references, which is quite different from those cookie-cutters approaches used by most cookie-cutter patent research firms.
More specifically, JD uses an iterative and attending-to-details approach when it comes to patent search. In the first round, JD usually searched for references (in the same general field of a looking-to-be-patented invention) that are generally relevant to key components of the invention. After the first round of search, JD usually identified several highly relevant references and read each of them, cover-to-cover if needed, so as to gain a better understanding of the state of the prior art. This "reading cover-to-cover" step and effort is usually missing in most cookie-cutter patent research firms, since it is deemed uneconomical, unnecessary, and over time-consuming in relation to generating a search report for a client (which is usually what a client expects). However, this "reading cover-to-cover" step and effort is the linchpin of JD's tailored and iterative approach for patent search, since this step usually enables JD to come up with more, if not much more, relevant search queries for the next round of patent search, which often uncovers better, if not much better, prior art references. And JD iterates the aforementioned steps over and over again util the newly generated search results no longer contain prior art references that are better than the ones already uncovered.
JDM Patent Law PLLC